Process
https://youtu.be/iNsCVG_edDo
The most interesting
thing about my process project was the elimination. I thought of many ideas.
Some were silly, or mundane, or private. I initially wanted to film the process
of going down a set of stairs, or tying a shoe—this idea quickly bored me, even
with all my ideas about filming gimmicks. Then I thought I could film the
process of my fiancé packing up his things at midnight each night and walking
back to his apartment—this idea only last a minute or two, because frankly that’s
a pretty intimate part of my life and sharing it in front a university class is
not necessarily something I’m comfortable with.
The project I ended up
doing is a weird washi-tape creation on the living room wall of my apartment. I
honestly should have just filmed the process of me trying to set up filming the
process, because it was an ordeal. As I write this, there’s a chair atop a sofa
in my living room, upside down, covered in spools of decorative tape. While I
was putting up the tape, I had a moment of panic as I remembered Jan Yager’s
search for authenticity—something I very much would like to emulate, especially
as a teacher—because I felt pretty uncertain about the authenticity of what I
was doing. I vocalized this, and one of my roommates pointed out that the
authenticity of what they were watching me do was pretty dead-on. I have a
habit of making things or printing things and taping them to the walls in our
home (see the Dennis Quaid picture at the end of my process video), and I love
to draw simplistic replications of the human face. I like color and bright
things. I was still challenging myself by doing something I hadn’t exactly done
before (in terms of method) but I was also dealing in artistic aspects that
were familiar and dear to me—and, bonus points, supported by women I love and
respect very much.
I think what I can draw
from this as far as creative processes in the classroom goes is this: process
is a) not easily replicated b) intrinsic as much as it is extrinsic and c)
deeply, deeply personal. Structure is important when teaching creative process,
as structure is important in just about everything I will ever teach. But part
of the idea of process is about self-discovery and an intimate conversation
with one’s self, in a new and potentially scary (via vulnerability) way.
When it comes to
creative work, my students, much like me, may vacillate between over simplified
interpretations of assignments and ideas that may expose their inner selves in
a way that they aren’t quite ready for. I think the important thing is to meet
them where they’re at. Show them mentor texts, personal examples, patience, all
of it. But give the creative process its own authenticity and power in a
student’s life. Give them a safe place to practice that process.
I really enjoyed your video. It was a fun process to watch and it was really neat getting to see your creativity at work. I think what your roommate said about authenticity is right on the ball. Where I find the comments that Jan Yager said about authenticity interesting, for me I find it a little bit more simple than that. I think as long as you are staying true to yourself and have purpose to your art then you are being authentic. After reading your description of how you enjoy taping things onto the wall, you are definitely being authentic yourself.
ReplyDeleteAllie, I really appreciate your thoughts about vulnerability. Considering being vulnerable is difficult and scary but powerful all at the same time. Some of the most evocative, memorable pieces of art I have ever engaged with were rooted in the artist's deeply vulnerable engagement with the piece. But as you discussed, sometimes there's a line that we are hesitant to cross. How can we as teachers encourage vulnerability but remain mindful about boundaries and keeping the classroom setting safe?
ReplyDelete